Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: PassiveX is dead?
From: HD Moore <hdm () metasploit com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:34:52 -0500
On 6/20/2011 10:00 AM, Richard Miles wrote:
Hey HD Moore I see. But reverse_https is not able to reuse the same connection from IE, right? Sor for example, if the IE browser uses a proxy and the proxy require authentication (integrated on the DC) it will fail, right?
The first stage of reverse_https uses the same information that IE does to make the connection (through the use of WinInet). The second stage does not and this is where work needs to be done. -HD _______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
Current thread:
- PassiveX is dead? Richard Miles (Jun 19)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? HD Moore (Jun 19)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? Richard Miles (Jun 20)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? HD Moore (Jun 20)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? Richard Miles (Jun 26)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? HD Moore (Jun 26)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? Richard Miles (Jun 26)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? Richard Miles (Jun 20)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? HD Moore (Jun 19)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? Sherif El-Deeb (Jun 20)
- Re: PassiveX is dead? Richard Miles (Jun 26)