Re: Meterpreter bind tcp payload

[Eric <dkn4a1 () gmail com>]

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:37 AM, HD Moore <hdm () metasploit com> wrote:
> On 8/29/2011 6:07 AM, Eric wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Could be a noob question, but how a system which gets exploited
> > successfully and having meterpreter/bind_tcp as its payload, is
> > supposed to be connected to a server running multi/handler. Or is the
> > multi/handler which has to connect to the exploited system, if so,
> > how?
>
> The exploit starts the payload handler, which automatically connects to
> the bind listener. If you create a bind_tcp executable you would need to
> use a multi/handler - the same way as you normally do reverse_tcp,
> except you would need to specify the RHOST.

Oh. But, isn't that very much similar with reverse_tcp?

Imagine a scenario, where I don't have a static IP address and I have
distributed bind_tcp executables.
I want to connect to exploited systems on my own, and don't really
wish to use shell/bind_tcp.

So, according to you, using meterpreter/bind_tcp is not possible in
this scenario?

> -HD
> _______________________________________________
> https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework