Re: Privilege escalation on an isolated system

[Brahim Sakka <brahim.sakka () gmail com>]

2011/11/30, Enis Sahin <enis.c.sahin () gmail com>:
> I think it sounds either like he is in the army (mandatory service
> etc.) and trying to get unrestricted access to the army computers to
> install some games or he is trying to get unlimited access to his
> corporate laptop so that he can use it freely.
>
> Don't mean to point fingers but how else do you get an isolated system
> involved in your project scope?

Thank you for pointing fingers here.
FYI my client has a NAC with VERY restrictive limitations for guests.
That is why I am describing the system as isolated here.

> Enis
>
>
> On 30 November 2011 23:00, Tim Brown <tmb () 65535 com> wrote:
> > On Monday 28 Nov 2011 00:57:44 Lukas Kuzmiak wrote:
> > > just came across this tool from pentestmonkey, seems to be very nice.
> > >
> > > http://code.google.com/p/windows-privesc-check/
> >
> > I don't often post here, but since it's come up, you all might well like
> > wpc's
> > older brother unix-privesc-check also written by pentestmonkey (and which
> > I've
> > kinda inherited).  I'm working on v2 of the latter at the moment.  Neither
> > are
> > perfect but they do offer some quick wins on penetration tests.
> >
> > Tim
> > --
> > Tim Brown
> > <mailto:tmb () 65535 com>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.enissahin.com | http://twitter.com/enis_sahin
> _______________________________________________
> https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework