Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: wdbrpc_memory_dump.rb bug and question
From: "Joshua J. Drake" <jdrake () metasploit com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:53:44 -0600
Robin, Setting the "OFFSET" variable indictates that you wish to resume a partial dump. This feature is intended to be used along with an existing dump that did not complete. The initial portion of the dump should remain undisturbed while the new parts will be written starting at the supplied offset. Currently, starting at a specific offset and writing to a new file is not supported. This is due to some strangeness with ruby's handling of various file options... For now, if you absolutely must preserve the old partial dump, copy vxworks_memory2.dump to vxworks_memory3.dump and then retry. If you haven't created a ticket yet, it may not be necessary. I modified the module to fall-back to writing a new file in case it fails to open.. You can see the pull request / commit here: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/130 PS. Please Include the datastore (via info or set commands) in your bug reports to help streamline the troubleshooting process in the future. On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:54:59PM +0000, Robin Wood wrote:
I've just reproduced this showing the directory exists but the file doesn't, this is only when the offset is set to non-zero, if I set it to 0 then it runs fine. I'll put a ticket in for it.
-- Joshua J. Drake
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
Current thread:
- wdbrpc_memory_dump.rb bug and question Robin Wood (Jan 24)
- Re: wdbrpc_memory_dump.rb bug and question HD Moore (Jan 24)
- Re: wdbrpc_memory_dump.rb bug and question Robin Wood (Jan 24)
- Re: wdbrpc_memory_dump.rb bug and question Robin Wood (Jan 25)
- Re: wdbrpc_memory_dump.rb bug and question Joshua J. Drake (Jan 25)
- Re: wdbrpc_memory_dump.rb bug and question Robin Wood (Jan 25)
- Re: wdbrpc_memory_dump.rb bug and question Robin Wood (Jan 24)
- Re: wdbrpc_memory_dump.rb bug and question HD Moore (Jan 24)