nanog mailing list archives
Re: SF NAP status
From: Gordon Cook <gcook () tigger jvnc net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 21:19:39 -0500 (EST)
Two things seem strange. Why is Sprint only thinking about connecting to the california NAP? I thought it was mandatory for sprint to do so?? Why is sprint late? 2nd question: for those of us outside of california...what the heck is the PUC thing all about? ******************************************************************** Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher Subscr.: Individ $85 The COOK Report on Internet -> NREN Non Prof., Gov't & 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 Small Corp $175 (609) 882-2572 Corp. Site Lic $500 Internet: gcook () tigger jvnc net Monthly policy & tech news ******************************************************************** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- SF NAP status Frank Liu (Nov 11)
- Re: SF NAP status Gordon Cook (Nov 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SF NAP status Stan Barber (Nov 11)
- Re: SF NAP status Martin L. Schoffstall (Nov 15)