nanog mailing list archives

Re: A sample bilateral agreement in Sprint's NAP handbook


From: Paul Love <epl () SDSC EDU>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 1994 09:41:48 -0800 (PST)


In ref. to marty's note below, if others have a bilateral they'd like
to share I'd be glad to see if I can fit another into the next
version.  Be sure to strip out any name/other info, etc before
forwarding.


paul

On Tue, 1 Nov 1994, Martin Lee Schoffstall wrote:

don't sweat it, i was just being my normal cajoling self

other bilats are what i'd like to see

m

Marty

Sorry for the lack of credit to PSI.  It will be rectified ASAP.
The fault is mine for not checking where the original text came 
from, for which you have humble apologies. 


Paul
Consultant to Sprint
for the NSF NAP Project

On Tue, 1 Nov 1994, Marty Schoffstall wrote:


fyi,

the bilateral agreement found in the sprint nap handbook is 90% materially
what PSI and SPRINT have worked on together for a bilateral. (it would
be nice if sprint had given us a bit of citation there).

This is the second bilateral example that psi has worked on with others.
Since bilaterals are EXPLICITLY part of the NAP model, it would be nice
to see some other agreements posted for reference purposes, or is this
going to be confidential/proprietary matters?

marty




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: