nanog mailing list archives
The "best" version of "ping"?
From: Vince Fuller <vaf () Valinor BARRNET NET>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 94 15:41:15 PDT
Throughout the years, I've seen a number of different versions of "ping" with various features like: - "-f" switch which pings a destination as fast as possible - "-c" switch which acts like the ping function on a cisco router - TTL reporting - improved clock resolution - ability to specify data pattern - ability to source jumbograms I would be interested in finding versions of "ping" with such "enhanced" functionality. Does anyone have either a canonical "best" version that incorporates many/all of these enhancements or, failing that, pointers to various versions which incorporate different sets of features? Thanks, --Vince - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- The "best" version of "ping"? Vince Fuller (Oct 04)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jeffrey C Honig (Oct 04)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 04)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Eric M. Carroll (Oct 04)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jeffrey C Honig (Oct 05)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jamshid Mahdavi (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Hans-Werner Braun (Oct 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Dale S. Johnson (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Geoff White (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Tony Bates (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jeffrey C Honig (Oct 19)
- Re: The "best" version of "ping"? Jeffrey C Honig (Oct 04)