nanog mailing list archives
Re: Comments
From: "Milo S. Medin" (NASA Ames Research Center) <medin () nsipo nasa gov>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 94 00:11:17 -0700
Tim, > To: bmanning () isi edu (Bill Manning) > Cc: ltwu () faline bellcore com, iepg () iepg org, nanog () merit edu, > nap-info () merit edu > Subject: Re: Comments > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 94 16:18:23 -0700 > [...] > The issue behind the NAP's is that they could have been engineered t o > use simpler and more mature interconnect technology at the start, bu t > are instead using immature technology to meet non-technical requirem ents > that the customers of the NAPs are not they themselves imposing. > [...] The Sprint NAP is using FDDI initially. -tjs Mea Culpa. I forgot to point this out. Sprint's NAP does start with FDDI and evolve into national ATM access, and also allows colocation of user owned equipment at the Sprint NAP. You guys should be congratulated on putting engineering and management issues ahead of marketing in your design. KISS still triumphs over complexity, even in today's frantic age... Thanks, Milo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Comments Tim Salo (Aug 31)
- Re: Comments Milo S. Medin (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Bill Manning (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Joseph W. Stroup (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Bill Manning (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Bill Manning (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Milo S. Medin (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Martin Lee Schoffstall (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comments Joseph W. Stroup (Aug 31)
- Re: Comments Steve Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Dave Sincoskie (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Curtis Villamizar (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Stephen Wolff (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Martin Lee Schoffstall (Sep 01)
- Re: Comments Curtis Villamizar (Sep 01)