nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing meltdown
From: Tim Bass <bass () linux silkroad com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 17:26:38 -0400 (EDT)
What you want is something that isn't the Internet or even a hop-by-hop destination-based connectionless packet network, but rather something akin to X.25 or ATM.Sean....which requires even more state kept in gateways, and therefore more CPU required to maintain that state. Film at 11. --vadim
CPUs are cheap. One 133 MHz Pentium cost less than either of us make in a day..... In six months, even cheaper. Tim
Current thread:
- Re: routing meltdown, (continued)
- Re: routing meltdown Paul A Vixie (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 12)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Tim Bass (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Sean Doran (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Curtis Villamizar (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jerry Scharf (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Vadim Antonov (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Tim Bass (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Dave Siegel (Aug 13)
- Re: routing meltdown Tim Bass (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Sean Doran (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Hans-Werner Braun (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Scott Bradner (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Barney Wolff (Aug 12)
- Re: routing meltdown Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: routing meltdown Sean Doran (Aug 13)
- Re: routing meltdown Kent W. England (Aug 15)