nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing meltdown
From: jon () branch com (Jon Zeeff)
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 11:04:30 -0400 (EDT)
the number of paths most XP routers tend to carry nowadays; the computer next to the router would be the one to absorb the heavy load of handling so many neighbors, routes and paths, and these computers can be upgrade with more ease than can the routers.
I absolutely agree that the time has come to remove complex routing protocols from routers and use workstations.
Current thread:
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 10)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown William B. Norton (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Paul A Vixie (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Nicolas Williams (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Paul A Vixie (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Yakov Rekhter (Aug 11)
- Re: routing meltdown Jon Zeeff (Aug 11)