nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x?
From: Ted Linnenkamp <tedlin () microsoft com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 95 13:26:28 PST
Message-ID: red-13-msg951213213258MTP[01.51.00]000000ac-28766 MCI announces smaller routes for its customers that do not use the CIDR blocks given to MCI. If you brought address space to MCI they would announce it. The most important thing is that on NEW CIDR blocks they stay aggregated. This is why Sprint will not listen to the announcement of /18 or less address space in the 207.xx/8 block. Painful but effective. Ted L. ---------- From: Jon Zeeff <jon () branch com> To: <cook () cookreport com> Cc: <dmbarton () mci net>; <smd () chops icp net>; <freedman () netaxs com>; <nanog () merit edu> Subject: Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Date: Wednesday, December 13, 1995 1:17PM I think this is misleading. MCI does announce routes smaller than this for its customers.
MCI aggregates all its customer's routes into /19's. We have just
Current thread:
- Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x?, (continued)
- Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Daniel Karrenberg (Dec 14)
- Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Curtis Villamizar (Dec 15)
- Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Curtis Villamizar (Dec 15)
- Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Avi Freedman (Dec 13)
- Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Andrew Partan (Dec 13)
- Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Avi Freedman (Dec 13)
- Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Daniel M. Barton (Dec 13)
- Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Sean Doran (Dec 16)