nanog mailing list archives
Re: IISP Congress (fwd)
From: Sean Doran <smd () sprint net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 19:57:29 -0500
| The $600 registration fee for this event also begs the question of what, if | any, value the ISOC brings to NANOG. I shall be extremely frank and state that in my humble personal opinion, the answer to Vince's question is: "Absolutely Nothing". Moreover, if you swap out NANOG and swap in IEPG, the answer is still "Absolutely Nothing", in spades. Sean. P.S.: I think ISOC's role in these operations forums should be limited to nil, or at most allowing them to offset the cost of coffee and donuts that the hosts of the NANOG or IEPG conferences usually provide, provided, of course, that ISOC well understands that neither body is beholden to it, or operates "under its auspices" or whatever.
Current thread:
- IISP Congress (fwd) Elise Gerich (Feb 22)
- Re: IISP Congress (fwd) Hong Chen (Feb 22)
- Re: IISP Congress (fwd) Curtis Villamizar (Feb 22)
- Re: IISP Congress (fwd) Paul Love (Feb 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IISP Congress (fwd) Vince Fuller (Feb 22)
- Re: IISP Congress (fwd) Sean Doran (Feb 22)
- Re: IISP Congress (fwd) Tim Salo (Feb 22)