nanog mailing list archives
Test Route
From: Dino Farinacci <dino () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 16:27:23 -0800
This seems brain dead. I think the intent of 1597 was to say here are some numbers you can go play with privately. Since they are private they should never appear on the public Internet, anywhere, ever. If any router on the public Internet sees a packet to (or from) a 1597 network it can throw it in the bit bucket and forget it.
As long as you say "can" rather than "must". Right now these sort of packets will follow the default route. Dino
Current thread:
- Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Ehud Gavron (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Paul Traina (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Jan 31)
- Re: Test Route Ehud Gavron (Jan 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Test Route Jon Postel (Jan 30)
- Test Route Dino Farinacci (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Paul Traina (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Theodore Ts'o (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route David R Conrad (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route John Curran (Jan 30)
- Re: Test Route Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 31)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 31)
- Re: Test Route Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 31)
- Re: Test Route bmanning (Jan 31)