nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tentative NANOG agenda
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 19:27:44 -0500
Susan, Nice agenda. Two small comments. In message <Pine.SUN.3.91.950130162040.3989B-100000 () home merit edu>, "Susan R. Harris" writes:
MCInet Sean Doran SprintLink Jack Waters
Gee, I wanted to do MCInet and SprintLink. :-) Are you sure the speakers aren't reversed?
11:15 a.m. Route Flap Damping Algorithm Curtis Villamizer
On the more serious side - I thought that the original topic brought up be Sean was "Route Flap Considered Harmful - Very Harmful", which I didn't want to touch because I didn't want to get sucked into a big statistics project. I was volunteered to present the route flap dampenning work, but I thought we would have someone talk about the why we think this problem is getting so out of control and what immediate things might be done about it. At the meeting we will be proposing a technical solution without first stating the problem, let alone justifying that something really does need to be done about it. This doesn't seem to fit in all that well with an operational meeting, but I'll gladly make the presentation if anyone thinks it is worth attending. Curtis btw- if possible, please have wb running and a way to project it at the meeting.
Current thread:
- Tentative NANOG agenda Susan R. Harris (Jan 30)
- Re: Tentative NANOG agenda Matt Mathis (Jan 30)
- Re: Tentative NANOG agenda Jack Waters (Jan 30)
- Re: Tentative NANOG agenda Sean Doran (Jan 30)
- Re: Tentative NANOG agenda Jack Waters (Jan 30)
- Re: Tentative NANOG agenda Curtis Villamizar (Jan 30)
- Re: Tentative NANOG agenda Sean Doran (Jan 30)
- Re: Tentative NANOG agenda Sean Doran (Jan 30)
- Re: Tentative NANOG agenda Matt Mathis (Jan 30)