nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic address allocation policy
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () sprint net>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 15:35:27 -0500
How do we users get our say to ensure that an addressing architecture doesn't come into existence which tends to lock us into a particular provider?
Fund my TRAP research? (See pre-publication drafts in ftp.sprintlink.net:engineer/avg). I'm doing it on my own time. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: Internic address allocation policy, (continued)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Bill Manning (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Bill Manning (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Paul Traina (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Bill Manning (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 21)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Gordon Cook (Mar 23)