nanog mailing list archives
PI vs PA Address Space
From: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg () ripe net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 09:13:48 +0200
> bmanning () ISI EDU writes: > > As an aside, is anyone else besides Sprint behind this /18 > model? I know that Sean is a big proponent but I have heard > no other public comment on this. (well there was one, which > indicated that the community had reached consenses on this point, > which is why I ask.) If Sprint wants to reach European destinations it will not fly because we allocate /19s to new service providers due to our slow-start allocation policy. Sprint knows this. Daniel
Current thread:
- PI vs PA Address Space, (continued)
- PI vs PA Address Space Daniel Karrenberg (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Sean Doran (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space bmanning (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Karl Denninger, MCSNet (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Michael Dillon (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Peter Berger (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Jerry Anderson (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space bmanning (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Michael F. Nittmann (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Jerry Anderson (May 18)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space David R Conrad (May 19)
- PI vs PA Address Space Daniel Karrenberg (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space peter (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space Michael F. Nittmann (May 19)
- Re: PI vs PA Address Space bmanning (May 20)