nanog mailing list archives
Re: links on the blink (fwd)
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 21:51:46 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 9 Nov 1995, Paul A Vixie wrote:
sky can save us. This time, gentlemen, the calvary is not coming. As much as I despise the topic Matt and Vadim have been discussing today, I think we're looking at some kind of load sharing. Probably static load sharing with no adaptation to traffic type or flow, since as Jerry pointed out a few weeks back, that's a slippery slope and a lot of people have died on it.
By "load sharing" I presume you mean some sort of TDM where you have n real lines and every n'th packet goes out on any particular line. I suppose this would be even simpler to do at the byte level if we assume that all n lines go to the same endpoint. Or do you mean something different? Michael Dillon Voice: +1-604-546-8022 Memra Software Inc. Fax: +1-604-542-4130 http://www.memra.com E-mail: michael () memra com
Current thread:
- Re: links on the blink (fwd), (continued)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) Sean Doran (Nov 08)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) Vadim Antonov (Nov 08)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) Vadim Antonov (Nov 09)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) bmanning (Nov 09)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) Hans-Werner Braun (Nov 09)
- VOD Vision (was: blinking links) Tim Bass (Nov 09)
- Re: VOD Vision (was: blinking links) Michael Dillon (Nov 09)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) Vadim Antonov (Nov 09)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) Paul A Vixie (Nov 09)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) Paul A Vixie (Nov 09)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) Michael Dillon (Nov 09)
- Re: links on the blink (fwd) Paul A Vixie (Nov 09)