nanog mailing list archives

Re: Routing wars pending?


From: Tim Bass <bass () dune silkroad com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 13:22:23 -0500 (EST)


Absolutely agree  with both Robert and Vadim that DNS need to be revised
in a big way.  I especially would like to see the MX record concept 
applied to information services (IX maybe), i.e.


foo.bar.org.    IN      A       198.133.151.19
                        IX  10  fooU2.bar.org.
                        IX  20  foo2U2.bar.org.
                        IX  30  whoU2.maybe.com.
                        IX  40  tryMe2.friendly.com.

www.bar.org.    IN      CNAME   foo.bar.org.


Has this simple concept been proposed in an IETF draft unknown to
us ugly ducklings :-)

Quack.

Tim

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Tim Bass                           | #include<campfire.h>                | 
| Principal Network Systems Engineer |       for(beer=100;beer>1;beer++){  |
| The Silk Road Group, Ltd.          |           take_one_down();          |
|                                    |           pass_it_around();         |
| http://www.silkroad.com/           |       }                             |
|                                    |  back_to_work(); /*never reached */ | 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+


  


                        

-- 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Tim Bass                           | #include<campfire.h>                | 
| Principal Network Systems Engineer |       for(beer=100;beer>1;beer++){  |
| The Silk Road Group, Ltd.          |           take_one_down();          |
|                                    |           pass_it_around();         |
| http://www.silkroad.com/           |       }                             |
|                                    |  back_to_work(); /*never reached */ | 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+


Current thread: