nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering long prefixes
From: Sean Doran <smd () icp net>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 06:25:46 -0400
Yes, Geert Jan, but if you look at the list I prepared, you'll note that the only chunks of old style Bs that are 18-bits long all come from one home-AS and most are in a pair of old-style class Bs which easily could be aggregated into a single /15 with the loss of some routing specificity (which is lost anyway when that provider's internal metrics don't propagate to its external peers). The remainder of the 'chunks' of old style Bs are all longer than 18 bits, and most are /24s or /26s, and I see none at all that appear difficult to aggregate, or which look like anything other than leaks due to misconfiguration. If you get to the point where someone needs to have a /18 in the old-style class B space and it can't be aggregated, we can return to this. Sean.
Current thread:
- filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Geert Jan de Groot (Sep 21)
- filtering long prefixes Mark Kent (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Hans-Werner Braun (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Nick Williams (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes John Bradley (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Willi Huber (Sep 26)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- filtering long prefixes Mark Kent (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Dave Siegel (Sep 22)
- filtering long prefixes Mark Kent (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Sean Doran (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Michael Dillon (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Michael Dillon (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Kai (Sep 21)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Noel Chiappa (Sep 22)
- Re: filtering long prefixes Dave Siegel (Sep 22)
(Thread continues...)