nanog mailing list archives
Re: Address "portability"
From: Peter Lothberg <roll () stupi se>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 96 13:05:58 MET DST
What is the general consensus of this group regarding the "portability" of addresses in the 204/8 and 205/8 range? -- Eric Kozowski Structured Network Systems, Inc. kozowski () structured net Better, Cheaper, Faster -- pick any two. (503)656-3530 Voice "Providing High Quality, Reliable Internet Service" (800)881-0962 Voice 56k to DS1
Portable addresses is an illusion, as it does no scale. Give me a call when you convinced the phone_company to make my phone number work in California. --Peter
Current thread:
- Re: Address "portability" Peter Lothberg (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" bmanning (Apr 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Address "portability" Erik-Jan Bos (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Mike O'Dell (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Per Gregers Bilse (Apr 06)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Andrew Smith (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Jerry Scharf (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Vadim Antonov (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
(Thread continues...)