nanog mailing list archives
RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys.
From: salo () msc edu (Tim Salo)
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 22:18:55 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 17:12:24 -0800 To: salo () msc edu (Tim Salo), nanog () merit edu From: "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com> Subject: RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. At 08:25 AM 4/5/96 -0600, Tim Salo wrote:Perhaps, the [anticipated] consolidation of ISPs will be a significant event in the efforts to control routing table size.Do we need address leasing to hasten that process or should we let the market decide? In any event, anyone buying up a bunch of ISPs will have a difficult time cleaning up the aggregation of addresses they inherit.
Obviously, cleaning up the current swamp is difficult. On the other hand, should consolidation occur, presumably a smaller number of larger ISPs would use a smaller number of larger address blocks, (plus or minus issues of the magnitude of dual-homing and changing upstream providers). -tjs
Current thread:
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys., (continued)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Michael Dillon (Apr 05)
- Re: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Tim Salo (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- Re: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Justin W. Newton (Apr 05)
- Re: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Christopher E. Stefan (Apr 07)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Kent W. England (Apr 05)
- Re: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Curtis Villamizar (Apr 08)
- RE: CIDR,Sprint and the Big Guys. Tim Salo (Apr 05)