nanog mailing list archives
Re: Inter-exchange media types
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 18:23:41 -0400
In message <Chameleon.960428080814.hank () hank tlv ibm net il>, Hank Nussbacher w rites:
[ ... lots of stats for 40 input ports deleted ... ]
c) Per port thruput: 64 byte frame per second (24 frame bursts on 40 ports) Cisco: 4891 DEC: 4391
Hmm. 5 kpps per port. Not really useful for a major interconnect is it? For the smaller interconnects the Cisco 5000 looks very good.
Bottom line: The Gigaswitch performed the almost the worst (Fibronics took t hat honor) and the Cisco performed the best. Perhaps it is time to revisit the Gigaswitch technology?
Or at least avoid using the DEC 24 port ethernet card which seems to be what was tested. Data on the dual FDDI card would be more useful for considering what to expect at the major interconnects. Curtis
Current thread:
- Re: Inter-exchange media types, (continued)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Paul A Vixie (Apr 25)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Andrew Partan (Apr 25)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Michael Dillon (Apr 25)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types ipasha (Apr 25)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Wolfgang Henke (Apr 25)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Vadim Antonov (Apr 25)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Paul Ferguson (Apr 25)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Paul Ferguson (Apr 25)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types k claffy (Apr 27)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Hank Nussbacher (Apr 27)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Curtis Villamizar (Apr 29)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types ipasha (Apr 30)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Peter Lothberg (Apr 30)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Marten Terpstra (Apr 30)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Peter Lothberg (Apr 30)
- Re: Inter-exchange media types Paul A Vixie (Apr 30)