nanog mailing list archives
Re: Access to the Internic Blocked
From: Geoff Huston <gih () aarnet edu au>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 15:37:59 +1000
Vadim writes,
On itself, LSRR is a godsend to hackers (i can think of about a dozen of very nasty attacks using general LSRR). The only useful application for it is traceroute. Why don't router vendors provide an option to turn it off for everything but ICMP ECHO?
Personally I find this an excellent suggestion. g - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked, (continued)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked bmanning (Aug 21)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Golan Ben-Oni (Aug 21)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Mark Kosters (Aug 21)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Golan Ben-Oni (Aug 21)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Carl Payne (Aug 21)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked bmanning (Aug 21)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked -- LSRR, traceroute with ICMP Edward Henigin (Aug 21)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked -- LSRR, traceroute with ICMP Ehud Gavron (Aug 22)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Curtis Villamizar (Aug 22)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked John Hawkinson (Aug 21)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Curtis Villamizar (Aug 22)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Avi Freedman (Aug 23)
- Re: Access to the Internic Blocked Curtis Villamizar (Aug 23)