nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Pushpendra Mohta <pushp () CERF NET>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 1996 16:57:29 -0800 (PST)
This is not to pick on CERFNET but just to highlight a problem of actually tracking the size of the routing table in general. This CERFnet case seems to be this way becuase it is a direct peer of Bill's box even though I can see no reason why the more specifics are needed. Looking a little more it seems a large amount of more specifics are being announced to Bill's boxe which aren't being announced to the xara.net router. Perhaps ISPs are taking more care at places like MAE-East with their outbound filters than they are at Bill's peering point even though Bill only has 6 active EBGP neighbors and the xara.net router has 39 ;-(.
Apparently true. The specifics leak from one of our CIDR blocks was only being made to Bill's peering point ( otherwise known as MAE-LA or MELEE when first started ;-) ). Being fixed shortly. Thanks On the larger question, it would be difficult to find two places on the net with a consistent view of the global routing table although for trend analysis both MAE East and the Sprint NAP should have a more of a representative view than MAE-LA. --pushpendra Pushpendra Mohta pushp () cerf net +1 619 455 3908 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Pushpendra Mohta (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report John S. Quarterman (Dec 03)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Meg Jahnke (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Alex.Bligh (Dec 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Dec 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Alex.Bligh (Dec 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Dec 02)
(Thread continues...)