nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 13:20:52 -0500
In message <199611300331.TAA06601 () chimp jnx com>, Tony Li writes:
Hey, this looks pretty good. Let's hope the trend continues (if, in fact, there *is* a trend). >Date Prefixes >231196 40687 >241196 40908 >251196 40844 >261196 41043 >271196 41074 >281196 39803 >291196 39735 I suspect that this is more due to the holiday than any real change. ;-( Someone could do a paper on periodic influences on the number of global prefixes. I'd really love to know when triple-witching day is... ;-) Tony
People withdraw their prefix announcement due to the holidays? Curtis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: The Cidr Report, (continued)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report John S. Quarterman (Dec 03)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Meg Jahnke (Dec 01)
- Re: The Cidr Report Alex.Bligh (Dec 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Dec 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Alex.Bligh (Dec 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Dec 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Dec 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Jessica Yu (Dec 02)
- Re: The Cidr Report Curtis Villamizar (Dec 05)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Dec 05)