nanog mailing list archives
Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting
From: Robert Elz <kre () munnari OZ AU>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 15:20:01 +1100
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 19:37:08 -0800 (PST) From: bmanning () ISI EDU (Bill Manning) Message-ID: <199602190337.AA09149 () zephyr isi edu> c) is part of the Dynamic DNS work. Not necessarily (not the way I read the message you quoted). The problem with off site secondaries with renumbering is generally that they have the IP address of the primary server in their named.boot file, and don't necessarily update it in any big hurry, even if requested. This is not an internal DNS issue, and dynamic dns isn't doing anything about this problem at all - that is, it is more just an implementation issue (the named.boot file could have names in it instead of IP addresses, with a bunch of extra work to make sure the name could still be resolved). kre
Current thread:
- Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Craig A. Huegen (Feb 17)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting - UPDATE Craig A. Huegen (Feb 17)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Bill Manning (Feb 18)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Robert Elz (Feb 18)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Jon Zeeff (Feb 19)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Matt Zimmerman (Feb 19)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Jon Zeeff (Feb 19)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Matt Zimmerman (Feb 19)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Craig A. Huegen (Feb 19)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Matt Zimmerman (Feb 20)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Robert Elz (Feb 18)
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Paul A Vixie (Feb 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Renumbering and the Feb 15-16 NANOG meeting Paul Ferguson (Feb 17)