nanog mailing list archives
Question on % of good routes and plea for an RA mail list was Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x?
From: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg () ripe net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 1996 13:31:23 +0100
> "Steven J. Richardson" <sjr () merit edu> writes: > > Lest anyone think that the PRDB was single-backbone-specific in > _design_ or capability (it pretty much was in terms of data), let > me note that, when Andy Adams and I rewrote the PRDB from a SPIRES > DB to a RDBMS (with help from Tom Libert and Sue Hares), we explicitly > designed in the ability to include data from other backbones. > > This was initially done to support both the T1 and T3 backbones, but > it could easily have supported other backbones as well. I know that, but if I recall things correctly the concept was one of just extending the number of "backbones" (i.e. last-resort routing services) and dit not support all implementable policies between autonomous ASes in a basically arbitrary topology. Or am I wrong? Daniel
Current thread:
- Re: Question on % of good routes and plea for an RA mail list was Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Susan Hares (Jan 03)
- Re: Question on % of good routes and plea for an RA mail list was Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Hans-Werner Braun (Jan 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Question on % of good routes and plea for an RA mail list was Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Steven J. Richardson (Jan 04)
- Question on % of good routes and plea for an RA mail list was Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 05)