nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe
From: Peter Lothberg <roll () stupi se>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 96 22:19:04 MET DST
We charge *everyone* for registration services. That is how it should be. There is no reason why governments (read: taxpayers) should be footing the bill.
This would be ok if there was a market for registry's. The current Ripe approach seems to build a large byracrazy, with lots and lots of paperworks, so you need more resources to process the paperworks, does not really support the part of the Internet we are where supposed to facilitate. If there is a finite resource that needs to be managed, it should be done in a fair way for all players, and right now i don't think that's not the case if we look at the globe as a whole. Fix the rules, open up more registrys wich all apply the same rules, maybe someone needs to audit the registrys to make sure that things are done correct, and have them compete on speed and effectiveness and cost. --Peter - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Sprint's route filters and Europe, (continued)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Alex.Bligh (Jun 03)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 04)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Curtis Villamizar (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Alex.Bligh (Jun 04)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Michael Dillon (Jun 03)
- Sprint's route filters and Europe Daniel Karrenberg (Jun 03)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Mike Norris (Jun 04)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Brian Carpenter CERN-CN (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe David R. Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe Brian Carpenter CERN-CN (Jun 18)