nanog mailing list archives
Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI)
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 01:27:43 -0500
At 09:48 PM 3/28/96 -0800, Paul A Vixie wrote:
Where's Padlipski when we need him?
Running IP datagrams across barbed-wire, methinks. ;-)
What ATM has is an excellent set of buzzwords and a lot of vendor support. What IP has is an actual market with real end-to-end products and users.
Therein lies the thrust, Paul. Folks need to devise a more 'real-world' concept of acceptable long-haul data transport services. - paul
Current thread:
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI), (continued)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Mike Trest (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Per Gregers Bilse (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Dorian Kim (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Mike Trest (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Curtis Villamizar (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Fletcher Kittredge (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Steve Steinberg (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Larry J. Plato (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Eric M. Carroll (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)