nanog mailing list archives
Re: Allocation of IP Addresses
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 22:49:57 -0500
At 11:49 AM 3/14/96 +0900, David R. Conrad wrote:
Basically, the market demand is INCREDIBLY HIGH and businesses want to build up infrastructure to meet this demand but the Internic IP address allocation procedures are too confusing and take too long.Your proposal is? If you say charging for address space, please explain what would stop deep pocket companies from buying up all the address space? Regards, -drc
Deja Vu. Again. Haven't I heard this somewhere before? :-) - paul
Current thread:
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses, (continued)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Michael Dillon (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Michael Dillon (Mar 13)
- Allocation of IP Addresses Daniel Karrenberg (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Nathan Stratton (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Matthew James Marnell (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Nathan Stratton (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul Ferguson (Mar 13)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Fleming (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Brett D. Watson (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul Ferguson (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Jeremy Porter (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Jeremy Porter (Mar 13)
- RE: Allocation of IP Addresses Jim Browning (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David R. Conrad (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses David C. Kovar (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Dorian Kim (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses com-priv (Mar 14)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Paul A Vixie (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Nathan Stratton (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Dave Siegel (Mar 13)
- Re: Allocation of IP Addresses Dorian Kim (Mar 13)