nanog mailing list archives
Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 22:14:55 -0700
Let me see if I correctly understand this. The RA services at MAE-West were never declared operational, yet there are service & transit providers using them for production services? If so, this will still be interpreted as a black eye for the RSs.
You're right. Technically the fault was with us (we who let our production peerage depend on nonproduction devices in the middle). But the eye most blackened by this week's events will be, undeservedly, the RA's. My own view is: good idea, bad execution in this instance. We're fixing it. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul A Vixie (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Michael Dillon (May 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Sean Doran (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul A Vixie (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Jake Khuon (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul Ferguson (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul A Vixie (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul Ferguson (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Sean Doran (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Sean Doran (May 24)
- Re: mae-west route servers are both down hard Paul Ferguson (May 25)