nanog mailing list archives
RE: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.)
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming () unety net>
Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 23:16:36 -0500
On Monday, May 27, 1996 7:13 PM, Nathan Stratton[SMTP:nathan () netrail net] wrote: @ On Mon, 27 May 1996, Jim Fleming wrote: @ @ > On Sunday, May 26, 1996 10:50 AM, Dorian Kim[SMTP:dorian () cic net] wrote: @ > @ On Sun, 26 May 1996, Tim Bass wrote: @ > @ @ > @ > Excuse me just a little, but I would like to follow-up on the @ > @ > Bush-o-Gram with regard to Jim Fleming and others whom Randy @ > @ > would love to silence in this world. @ > @ @ > @ > I am not sure why people on the Internet want to silence people. @ > I thought that the Internet was born with a basic goal of breaking @ > down centralized control over information flow and the censorship @ > that always goes with power being concentrated in a few people's @ > hands (or minds)... @ @ Humm, I don't think ARPA cared about breaking down centralized control @ over information flow and censorship. They wanted to connect DOD computers @ together and could care less about most of the things the internet is used @ for today. @ @ Nathan Stratton CEO, NetRail, Inc. Tracking the future today! I stand corrected...I should have said..."corruption" not "censorship"... -- Jim Fleming UNETY Systems, Inc. Naperville, IL e-mail: JimFleming () unety net - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) @NANOG-LIST (May 26)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Dorian Kim (May 26)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Paul A Vixie (May 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Jim Fleming (May 27)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) @NANOG-LIST (May 27)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Michael Dillon (May 27)
- RE: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Nathan Stratton (May 27)
- Re: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) @NANOG-LIST (May 27)
- RE: Stargates (In Defense of J.F.) Jim Fleming (May 27)