nanog mailing list archives
Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information )
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 1996 10:54:02 -0700
I've added ROUTING to do what TROUBLE is often used to do.I question whether this is a good idea -- some providers have a "routing" mailing list that isn't really intended for public dissemination and use. For instance, routing () uunet uu net and routing () es net both bypass their respective NOCs and go straight to engineering types -- perhaps we need to pick a new name for those sorts of lists, but I really don't see what having a "routing" buys us over "noc".
This is the kind of collision that makes this "standard" expensive to implement. Folks elsewhere use ROUTING as a way to reach the folks who want to hear about externally visible routing problems; NETCOM for example advertises this address in its RADB elements. I think that folks like UUNET and ESNET will have to pick new addresses if they don't want their engineers getting spammed. Sorry about that. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ), (continued)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) Paul A Vixie (May 03)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) bmanning (May 03)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) Christopher D. Wheeler (May 03)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) Paul Steiger (May 03)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) Dorian Kim (May 03)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) Brett Watson (May 05)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) Paul A Vixie (May 05)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) Michael Shields (May 03)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) Matt Zimmerman (May 03)
- Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information ) Curtis Villamizar (May 06)