nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP Allocation
From: Peter Galbavy <peter () wonderland org>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 10:02:53 +0000 (GMT)
Selling a virtual website without allocating a unique IP address is fraud and will continue to be fraud for the next few years.
I suspect it is only fraud if you knowingly provide someone with a service that is not going to work the way you said in your sales pitch. The original poster asked what the situation is with those large pseudo-ISPs that either provide their own version of browser software or force people through their own proxies, and if anyone knew when they would be "upgrading" to support the Host: (or whatever) thingy in HTTP 1.1. The question still stands... Pushing these people (by public ridicule if necessary) to move forward and help the Internet as a whole is a very valid function of this list, IMHO. Regards, -- Peter Galbavy peter () wonderland org @ Home phone://44/973/499465 in Wonderland http://www.wonderland.org/~peter/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- IP Allocation Pete Davis (Nov 19)
- Re: IP Allocation Michael Dillon (Nov 19)
- Re: IP Allocation Peter Galbavy (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Lyndon.Levesley (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Randy Bush (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Michael Handler (Nov 20)
- "Virtual" web servers (was Re: IP Allocation) Martin Cooper (Nov 20)
- Re: "Virtual" web servers (was Re: IP Allocation) Pete Davis (Nov 20)
- Re: "Virtual" web servers (was Re: IP Allocation) Jared Mauch (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Michael Dillon (Nov 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IP Allocation Jim Fleming (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Dima Volodin (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Paul A Vixie (Nov 20)
- Re: IP Allocation Dima Volodin (Nov 20)
- RE: IP Allocation Jim Fleming (Nov 20)