nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: "Brett D. Watson" <bwatson () genuity net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 22:41:43 -0800
from looking at tony's pages, i would say there's really no trend at all. the graph he posted of table size since he started the report again has bounced up and down by several thousand routes. maybe i'm being negative but it's fluctuationg quite a bit. good to see it down in any case. -brett
Hey, this looks pretty good. Let's hope the trend continues (if, in fact, there *is* a trend). - paul At 12:00 PM 11/29/96 -0800, Tony Bates wrote:Date Prefixes 231196 40687 241196 40908 251196 40844 261196 41043 271196 41074 281196 39803 291196 39735
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: The Cidr Report, (continued)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report William Allen Simpson (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 26)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)