nanog mailing list archives
Re: AGIS/DIGEX
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 09:03:38 -0500 (EST)
It seems a bit insane that people are required to be at N peering points for provider x to peer with provider y. If provider x and y can't reach each but are both at a peering point then surely thats a good enough reason to peer? Regards, Neil.
Well, except for those just "reaching the apex", most buy transit to those they don't peer with, so there's usually no *dis*connectivity - but there may indeed be highly suboptimal connectivity... Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX, (continued)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Nathan Stratton (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Nathan Stratton (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Dorian R. Kim (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Cathy Wittbrodt (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Bowman (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Cathy Wittbrodt (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Bowman (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Laughlin (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Neil J. McRae (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Neil J. McRae (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Jon Zeeff (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Ed Morin (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Tony Li (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Neil J. McRae (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Enke Chen (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Laughlin (Oct 30)