nanog mailing list archives
Re: Need hints on proper default route selection
From: alan () mindvision com (Alan Hannan)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 12:59:24 -0500 (CDT)
Hi Curtis,
The problem we have been experiencing now is that both NSP #1 and NSP #2 have been undergoing some major internal restructuring, causing daily change/loss of candidate net annoucements, or change in aggregation boundaries, etc..... making it a daily exercise at selecting proper candidate route selection.
Can anyone provide an alternate or better strategy on how to deal with this?
It would seem that NSP A and B would have some relatively static networks that they could tell you about. Perhaps their noc lan or web farm addressing. I realize this is rather a simple-ish fix, but you may wish to visit with some intelligent folk at the NSP to determine what these are. I would question if there is renumbering/announcement changes, or if they are having "BGP configuration problems". Another solution, with some, but less, negative ramifications, would be to select 2 or 3 networks within each NSP. Not a great fix, but a simple one to look at. A final solution would be to buy a 4700 w/ 64M of ram. You should be able to handle full tables from 2 peers along w/ all your IGP on this box. The port cost is not exceedingly high, and if you can afford the capital outlay, it sounds like it would be a rather good mediumish solution. Obviously the primary recommendation would be to "fix" the netedge problem, but I assume you're pursuing that. The fact that your NSP is rather unstable is also a negative, but you can only do so much (before you leave them hint hint) $0.02 -alan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Need hints on proper default route selection Curtis Generous (Oct 02)
- Re: Need hints on proper default route selection Alan Hannan (Oct 02)
- Re: Need hints on proper default route selection Jon Zeeff (Oct 02)