nanog mailing list archives
Re: a multihomed net
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 00:53:16 -0400
At 02:22 PM 10/23/96 +0000, Miguel A.L. Paraz wrote:
Yeah, application-level multihoming is great, considering most folks only need a couple of applications. :) Also, it is very applicable for our part of the world, where bandwidth costs are humongous, and BGP- capable routers come at inflated prices.
I would submit that applications are quite reliant upon routing for transit capabilities, so I'm not quite sure what your point is here. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- a multihomed net Zachary DeAquila (Oct 21)
- Re: a multihomed net Paul A Vixie (Oct 22)
- Re: a multihomed net Miguel A.L. Paraz (Oct 23)
- Re: a multihomed net Ed Kern (Oct 23)
- Re: a multihomed net Tony Li (Oct 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: a multihomed net Paul Ferguson (Oct 23)
- Re: a multihomed net Miguel A.L. Paraz (Oct 24)
- Re: a multihomed net Paul A Vixie (Oct 22)