nanog mailing list archives
Re: Incentive for route stabilty
From: jon () branch net (Jon Zeeff)
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 10:55:43 -0400 (EDT)
Lets assume for a moment that the majority of route instabilty is coming from inexperienced providers. With that assumption in hand
I doubt that this is the case. Poor software design seems to be the major cause. As Brian showed, there are lots and lots of needless updates. For example, delaying a withdraw might allow one to realize that it is no longer needed. There seems to be too much emphasis on short term patches vs study and long term solutions. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Incentive for route stabilty Scott Mace (Oct 25)
- Re: Incentive for route stabilty Doug Davis (Oct 26)
- Re: Incentive for route stabilty Jon Zeeff (Oct 26)
- Re: Incentive for route stabilty Michael Dillon (Oct 26)
- Re: Incentive for route stabilty Jeremy Porter (Oct 26)
- Re: Incentive for route stabilty Doug Davis (Oct 26)