nanog mailing list archives
Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations
From: Jim Dixon <jdd () vbc net>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 18:28:07 +0000 (GMT)
On Mon, 28 Oct 1996, Jian Li wrote:
The point is that GSL's peering policies are radically different from those of SprintLink, whereas Cable & Wireless seems to have the same policies worldwide. Similarly, I know that GSL's prices for transit used to be much higher than SprintLink's and I suppose still are.As what I know, GSL's peering policies have two parts, international and US domestic. The US domestic part is exactly the copy of SprintLink. International part is based on the idea of traffic localization.
Fine. This still leaves Sprint with two very different policies, one for the US and one for the rest of the world, whereas CWIX apparently has one policy for the whole world -- or at least for North America and Europe. I believe that over the next few years this is how things are going to go: peering policies and prices for transit will converge, at least in these two large markets. Americans tend to forget that Europe has a larger population and more money than the US; these basic facts are not going to let the current large imbalances persist. -- Jim Dixon VBCnet GB Ltd +44 117 929 1316 fax +44 117 927 2015 http://www.uk.vbc.net VBCnet West +1 408 971 2682 fax +1 408 971 2684 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations, (continued)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jim Dixon (Oct 25)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations alex (Oct 25)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Larry J. Plato (Oct 25)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jim Dixon (Oct 25)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jim Dixon (Oct 25)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jeremy Porter (Oct 26)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jim Dixon (Oct 26)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jian Li (Oct 28)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jim Dixon (Oct 28)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jian Li (Oct 28)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jim Dixon (Oct 28)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Karl Denninger (Oct 27)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider Robert Laughlin (Oct 27)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jim Dixon (Oct 25)
- Re: BigISP<-->SmallISP peerings Zachary DeAquila (Oct 25)
- Re: BigISP<-->SmallISP peerings Jon Zeeff (Oct 26)
- Re: BigISP<-->SmallISP peerings Zachary DeAquila (Oct 26)