nanog mailing list archives
The SWAMP
From: "Bradley Dunn" <bradley () dunn org>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 1996 18:44:09 -0400
I was doing my daily traceroutes to see who was down today, and i noticed some interesting things. One thing I noticed was that: c.root-servers.net e.root-servers.net g.root-servers.net i.root-servers.net all appear to be in the "twd", as well as being in the swamp. A well-known router vendor's web site also appeared to be in this category. Now I don't run anything nearing a real router, so I checked route-server.cerf.net, and sure enough they are being advertised as /24s. I realize renumbering the root servers is not really a good place to start.:-) Yet I think it shows what a massive task we have ahead of us, if we are to make progress in aggregating 192/8. I also think it would be hard to convince someone to renumber out of a /24 in 192, when they can say, "well almost half of the root servers haven't renumbered, why should I?". Just my observations. I'll crawl back into my little stub of the 'net and resume being a spectator. :) -BD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- The SWAMP Bradley Dunn (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Paul A Vixie (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Avi Freedman (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Randy Bush (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Avi Freedman (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Randy Bush (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Avi Freedman (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Havard . Eidnes (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Geoff Huston (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Havard . Eidnes (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Dorian R. Kim (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Avi Freedman (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Paul A Vixie (Sep 08)