nanog mailing list archives
Re: The SWAMP
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () quake net>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 12:04:34 -0700
I will echo Randy's sentiment here: is there a technical reason why the root name servers need special "provider-independent" addresses, or is this a solution looking for a problem?
Root name servers is the only legitimate use for fixed IP addresses. How about allocating some "good sounding" IP addresses for them, (like 1.0.0.x/32) and hard-wiring them into resolver code? Would save quite a lot of configuration headaches for newbies. --vadim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: The SWAMP, (continued)
- Re: The SWAMP Paul A Vixie (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Work Work Work Bill Manning (Sep 09)
- Re: Work Work Work Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Re: Work Work Work Jon Zeeff (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Paul A Vixie (Sep 08)
- Re: The SWAMP Jon Zeeff (Sep 09)
- Re: Root Nameserver IPs Zachary DeAquila (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Eric Ziegast (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Perry E. Metzger (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Mathias Koerber (Sep 09)
- Re: The SWAMP Eric Ziegast (Sep 10)
- Re: The SWAMP Deepak Jain (Sep 10)