nanog mailing list archives
Re: Top-50 Report
From: Peter Kline <peter () agis net>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 21:43:27 -0400 (EDT)
At 09:43 AM 9/14/96 -0700, Tony Bates wrote:
[..]
Or a lot less care and letting classful size announcments leak out and not aggregating to the allocation folks were given. To highlight I pick the last 50 classful entries I see in the 193, 198 and 206 range just to give a random sample and to illustrate. [...] 206
206.249.87.0 in AS4200 206.249.112.0 in AS4200 206.249.113.0 in AS4200 206.249.114.0 in AS4200 206.249.115.0 in AS4200 206.249.182.0 in AS4200 206.249.183.0 in AS4200 206.250.25.0 in AS4200 206.250.26.0 in AS4200 206.250.40.0 in AS4200 206.250.41.0 in AS4200 206.250.192.0 in AS4200 206.250.193.0 in AS4200 206.250.200.0 in AS4200 206.250.201.0 in AS4200 206.250.205.0 in AS4200 206.250.249.0 in AS4200 206.250.250.0 in AS4200
The above are a legacy of the net99 assimilation into AGIS and will disappear as we revise our filtering to reflect the completion of that task. Peter _Lucem Diffundo_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Top-50 Report, (continued)
- Re: Top-50 Report Vadim Antonov (Sep 14)
- Re: Top-50 Report Brett D. Watson (Sep 14)
- Re: Top-50 Report Neil J. McRae (Sep 14)
- RE: Top-50 Report Jim Browning (Sep 14)
- Re: Top-50 Report Jon Zeeff (Sep 14)
- Re: Top-50 Report Jim Van Baalen (Sep 16)
- Re: Top-50 Report Mr. Jeremy Hall (Sep 16)
- Re: Top-50 Report Jon Zeeff (Sep 16)
- Re: Top-50 Report Jon Zeeff (Sep 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Top-50 Report Dean Gaudet (Sep 14)