nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering points
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 1997 05:02:39 -0500 (EST)
Or is the entire thing irrelevant, because everyone is moving to private bilateral connections. And the important thing is how many providers does someone peer, not how many exchange points they're connected to. For the price of one Sprint-NAP connection, I can get several connections to Canada. And we have a lot more customers in Canada than at the Sprint-NAP. We already peer with everyone at the Sprint-NAP, or been turned down by them elsewhere. So one more exchange point doesn't buy much. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation
The SprintNAP is a much less congested place than MAE-East (though most providers also have less capacity out of it [besides Sprintlink, GSL, ICM, etc...])... Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: peering points Sean Donelan (Mar 31)
- Re: peering points Nathan Stratton (Apr 01)
- Re: peering points Robert Bowman (Apr 01)
- Re: peering points Edward Fang (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: peering points Tim Salo (Apr 01)
- RE: peering points Brian Smith (Apr 01)
- Re: Peering points Sean Donelan (Apr 01)
- Re: Peering points Mike Leber (Apr 01)
- Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 05)
- Re: Peering points Sean Donelan (Apr 05)
- RE: Peering points Rodney Joffe (Apr 05)
- RE: Peering points Dave Van Allen (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Nathan Stratton (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Alec H. Peterson (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- Re: Peering points Steve Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Apr 07)
- Re: Peering points Randy Bush (Apr 07)
- Re: Peering points Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- Re: peering points Nathan Stratton (Apr 01)
- Re: Peering points Edward Fang (Apr 06)