nanog mailing list archives

Re: Also, re: 7007


From: Jon Green <jcgreen () netins net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 11:46:06 -0500

On Fri, 25 Apr 1997 17:55:03 -0400 (EDT), freedman () netaxs com writes:
        

MAI is still working with Bay at their data center to reach the point
that they're comfortable re-advertising their routes directly.  Ciscos
have been offered to MAI, but MAI is still working with Bay.


As well they should.  Why is misconfiguration of a router a reason
to change vendors?  How about if we prove the existence of a bug before
spreading rumors?  There are some very large networks running on Bay 
routers, one of which I used to run.  I've always found that proper
configuration did wonders for making it work correctly.

-Jon


     -----------------------------------------------------------------
    *      Jon Green            *         "Life's a dance             *
   *   jcgreen () netINS net       *          you learn as you go"        *
  *  Finger for Geek Code/PGP   *                                       *
 *  #include "std_disclaimer.h" * http://www.netins.net/showcase/jcgreen *
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: