nanog mailing list archives
Re: Also, re: 7007
From: Jon Green <jcgreen () netins net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 11:46:06 -0500
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997 17:55:03 -0400 (EDT), freedman () netaxs com writes:
MAI is still working with Bay at their data center to reach the point that they're comfortable re-advertising their routes directly. Ciscos have been offered to MAI, but MAI is still working with Bay.
As well they should. Why is misconfiguration of a router a reason to change vendors? How about if we prove the existence of a bug before spreading rumors? There are some very large networks running on Bay routers, one of which I used to run. I've always found that proper configuration did wonders for making it work correctly. -Jon ----------------------------------------------------------------- * Jon Green * "Life's a dance * * jcgreen () netINS net * you learn as you go" * * Finger for Geek Code/PGP * * * #include "std_disclaimer.h" * http://www.netins.net/showcase/jcgreen * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Also, re: 7007 Avi Freedman (Apr 25)
- Re: Also, re: 7007 Jon Green (Apr 26)
- Re: Also, re: 7007 Avi Freedman (Apr 26)
- Re: Also, re: 7007 Jon Green (Apr 26)