nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nuclear power for POPs
From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 16:22:30 -0700 (MST)
At 14:50 8/8/97, William Duncanson wrote:I'll be more than happy to leverage my experience from my Nuclear Engineering days to help Internet companies plan for these redundant power plants. Each load of fuel would be good for about 18 to 24 months of sustained operation, and we could even design it so that should it experience an explosion, there is no confusion or expectation on the performance and viability of colocated and nearby equipment. ChrisSign me up! I want one of these in my back yard. I figure I could probably run the whole block off of one of these.It may soon be necessary to include one of these in each POP, given notable vendors increasing power demands... Chris, can you do 23" open rack designs? ;-) /John
Nuclear powered POPs.. Hmm.. I can see the outage ticket now.. "Technicians on site assessing colatteral damage. Apparently the site melted and there's nothing left to repair. ETR weeks for relocation to an area with safe radiation levels." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wayne Bouchard GlobalCenter web () primenet com Primenet Network Engineering Internet Solutions for (602) 416-6422 800-373-2499 x6422 Growing Businesses FAX: (602) 416-9422 http://www.primenet.com http://www.globalcenter.net ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Sean M. Doran (Aug 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Rodney Joffe (Aug 08)
- Nuclear power for POPs John Curran (Aug 08)
- Re: Nuclear power for POPs Vadim Antonov (Aug 08)
- Re: Nuclear power for POPs Wayne Bouchard (Aug 08)
- Re: Nuclear power for POPs Rusty Zickefoose (Aug 08)
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Rodney Joffe (Aug 08)
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Thomas Irpan (Aug 09)
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Chris A. Icide (Aug 08)
- RE: Nuclear power for POPs Tim Gibson (Aug 08)