nanog mailing list archives
Re: spam relaying by the big boys
From: Phil Howard <phil () charon milepost com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 23:24:16 -0500 (CDT)
Earlier, Myk O'Leary said:
Earlier, Jon Lewis said:----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <abuse () uu net> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mail.uu.net.:RCPT To:<abuse () uu net><<< 550 <abuse () uu net>... User unknown 550 <abuse () uu net>... User unknownConnected to mail.uu.net. Escape character is '^]'. 220 relay1.UU.NET ESMTP vrfy fsdf 550 fsdf... User unknown vrfy abuse 250 <abuse () relay1 UU NET> quit 221 relay1.UU.NET closing connection --
So the PR department got the word out before the sysadmins got the mailbox created? So which department is overloaded? -- Phil Howard KA9WGN +-------------------------------------------------------+ Linux Consultant | Linux installation, configuration, administration, | Milepost Services | monitoring, maintenance, and diagnostic services. | phil at milepost.com +-------------------------------------------------------+
Current thread:
- spam relaying by the big boys Jon Lewis (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys Christopher Masto (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys Chip Rosenthal (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys Greg A. Woods (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys Myk O'Leary (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys Phil Howard (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys Steve Mansfield (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys Myk O'Leary (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys wb8foz (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys Phil Howard (Aug 08)
- Re: spam relaying by the big boys Christopher Masto (Aug 08)