nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICMP Attacks???????
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 16:17:13 -0400
On Fri, Aug 22, 1997 at 02:21:12PM -0400, Alex Przekupowski wrote:
Maybe it should be a pre-defined filter that the manufactures include in the basic software configuration. If we put some pressure on Cisco/Bay/Ascend/Livingston etc....... maybe we can get it done there, so that we don't have to educate new people.
Didn't I just say something like this? :-) Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "People propose, science studies, technology Tampa Bay, Florida conforms." -- Dr. Don Norman +1 813 790 7592
Current thread:
- Re: Blocking spoofing at the source (was: ICMP Attacks??), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Blocking spoofing at the source (was: ICMP Attacks??) Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 22)
- Re: Blocking spoofing at the source (was: ICMP Attacks??) Robert Sanders (Aug 29)
- Re: Blocking spoofing at the source (was: ICMP Attacks??) Phil Howard (Aug 22)
- Re: Blocking spoofing at the source (was: ICMP Attacks??) Robert Sanders (Aug 29)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Peter E. Giza (Aug 21)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Jon Lewis (Aug 21)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev (Aug 21)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Jon Lewis (Aug 21)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Edward Henigin (Aug 21)
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Alex Przekupowski (Aug 22)
- Message not available
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 22)
- Message not available
- Re: ICMP Attacks??????? Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 26)