nanog mailing list archives
RE: Internet vs. Telephone company
From: "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 11:21:04 -0800
At 05:28 PM 31-01-97 -0800, Bharat Ranjan wrote:
Check out a product called 'Internet Thruway" that routes a call based on the Called Number. The idea is for telcos to implement this product as a back-end to their access network so calls being made to a Thruway provider never reach the voice network. It is instead sent (via IP and L2F) directly to the ISP's network. SBC is already committed to deploying this in parts of Texas.
It's a partial solution and expensive to implement. The data calls still have to go through at least the first voice switch. But it would be nice to receive packets rather than switched circuits and avoid the cost of building so many dial POPs, if the price is right. --Kent ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ Kent W. England Six Sigma Networks 1655 Landquist Drive, Suite 100 Voice/Fax: 619.632.8400 Encinitas, CA 92024 kwe () 6SigmaNets com Technical Expertise for PacBell NAP and PacBell Internet Services - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Internet vs. Telephone company Michael Shields (Feb 01)
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company Doug Tooley (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company Stephen Sprunk (Feb 01)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Paul J. Zawada (Feb 01)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Michael Dillon (Feb 01)
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company William Allen Simpson (Feb 02)
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company Allan Chong (Feb 04)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Kent W. England (Feb 03)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Tim Brown (Feb 03)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Brian Tackett (Feb 03)
- Re: Internet vs. Telephone company Jeremy Porter (Feb 03)
- RE: Internet vs. Telephone company Tim Brown (Feb 03)