nanog mailing list archives
Re: quick update #2 (Sprint continues to defend network terrorism)
From: Matt Ranney <mjr () wacky eit com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 13:46:44 -0800 (PST)
Barry Shein writes...
[...]
Understand: Sprint absolutely refuses to put ONE route block into their router at iq-internet.com between them and std.com.
So what's the huge difference here between Sprint putting the filter on one of their routers and you putting it on one of yours? Can your routers not afford the extra CPU? If they can, then just filter them and be done with it. Heck, use Paul's OSPF anti-spam prevention to be extra sure. -- Matt Ranney - mjr () ranney com This is how I sign all my messages. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- quick update #2 (Sprint continues to defend network terrorism) Barry Shein (Jan 04)
- Re: quick update #2 (Sprint continues to defend network terrorism) Matt Ranney (Jan 04)
- Re: quick update #2 (Sprint continues to defend network terrorism) Michael Dillon (Jan 04)
- Re: quick update #2 (Sprint continues to defend network terrorism) Peter Murray (Jan 06)